Back to Home

Revelation Exposed

A Critical Analysis of False Prophecy Outside Hebrew Truth

Discover the Evidence

The Hebrew Truth Revealed

The Book of Revelation claims apostolic authority, yet its content reveals a deep misunderstanding of Jewish theology, heavy reliance on pagan imagery, and prophecies that have not come to pass—violating the standard of true prophecy laid out in Deuteronomy 18:22.

1

Misunderstanding of Jewish Theology

The author demonstrates a fundamental lack of understanding of Hebrew concepts:

In Hebrew, the word שָּׂטָן (satan) simply means "adversary" or "accuser"—it's a role, not a personal name or cosmic villain.

Revelation 12:9 calls Satan "the great dragon, the ancient serpent, the devil"—mixing Babylonian dragons, Greek "diabolos," and the Garden of Eden serpent, twisting Jewish thought into pagan mythology.

2

Failed Prophecies

Revelation contains clear prophetic failures:

"Things which must soon take place." (Revelation 1:1)
"Surely I am coming soon." (Revelation 22:20)

Yet nothing described in Revelation has happened in the 2,000 years since. According to Deuteronomy 18:22: "When a prophet speaks in the name of YHWH, if the thing does not come to pass, that is a word YHWH has not spoken."

3

Pagan and Gnostic Imagery

Instead of drawing from Hebrew Scriptures, Revelation borrows from foreign myths:

  • Leviathan (Babylonian chaos monster)
  • Typhon (Greek serpent god)
  • Persian dualism of good vs evil cosmic forces

This is not the language of Moses or the Prophets—it's pagan apocalyptic fantasy, not Hebrew truth.

4

Non-Apostolic Writing Style

The style differs dramatically from authentic Johannine writings:

Gospel of John and 1 John use clear Greek, strong Hebrew structure, and emphasize light, love, and truth.

Revelation uses broken grammar, strange Greek, and apocalyptic symbols with no focus on love or truth—only wrath and destruction. Even ancient scholars like Dionysius of Alexandria said it could not be the same author.

5

Early Church Rejection

Many early Christian leaders questioned or rejected Revelation:

  • Dionysius of Alexandria - Said John the Apostle didn't write it
  • Eusebius - Classified it as disputed (antilegomena)
  • Caius of Rome - Believed it was written by a heretic
  • Martin Luther - "Neither apostolic nor prophetic"
6

Temple Contradiction

Revelation 21:22 boldly states:

"I saw no temple in the city."

This directly contradicts Ezekiel 40–48, which gives detailed prophecy of a future temple in the Messianic age. Jewish belief held that the Messiah would restore the temple and God's presence would dwell there forever.

Historical Timeline of Rejection

200 AD - Caius of Rome

Believed Revelation was written by a heretic, not an apostle.

3rd Century - Dionysius of Alexandria

Declared that John the Apostle could not have written Revelation due to style differences.

363 AD - Council of Laodicea

Left Revelation out of the official canon of Scripture.

4th Century - Eusebius

Classified Revelation as "disputed" (antilegomena) in his Ecclesiastical History.

Until 5th Century - Syriac Church

The Syriac Church rejected Revelation entirely until the 5th century.

The Final Verdict

Revelation was likely written by a non-Jewish author, disconnected from Hebrew prophecy, inspired by apocalyptic fantasies and foreign mythology. The early church doubted it, and its failed predictions show clearly this is not the Word of YHWH.

❌ This Book Is Not from God

It is time to separate truth from fiction, and return to the Hebrew roots of faith—not the Roman-imposed visions that twist the message of Yeshua.