Whom do you really serve?
Is it the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob — the One who sent a Redeemer named Yeshua to call us back to obedience?
Or is it a different gospel — one built on the letters of a man who claimed a private revelation?
________________________________________
YHWH sent a Redeemer who:
• Walked in Torah
• Taught obedience
• Called sinners to repent
• Warned against false teachers
• Never said, “grace alone” cancels God’s commandments

But Paul?
• Preached a message the original disciples never taught
• Built a doctrine the Redeemer never preached
• Opened the door to lawlessness — and called it freedom
________________________________________
The Core Question
Now here we are in 2025.
Millions claim to follow Jesus.
But we must ask:
Which Jesus? Whose gospel? Who do they really serve?
This isn’t a debate over denominations.
It’s the dividing line between the Redeemer God sent — and the religion man built.
________________________________________
Reframing Paul’s Warning:
When Paul warned, “You’ve turned to another gospel,”
he wasn’t pointing at Rome.
He wasn’t warning about paganism.
He was talking about James, Peter, and the Twelve — the ones who actually walked with the Messiah.
It wasn’t about heresy.
It was about control.
Paul wasn’t defending truth.
He was opposing the gospel of repentance and obedience.
________________________________________
Historical Context (clarified):
History is clear:
From AD 49 to 54, Emperor Claudius expelled all Jews — including Jewish followers of Yeshua — from Rome.
During those years, Gentile believers kept meeting.
But they followed the teachings of Jesus and His disciples,
not Paul.
Paul never claimed to have founded the Roman church.
In fact, he said:
“I’ve often been hindered from coming to you... I don’t want to build on someone else’s foundation.”
— Romans 15:20–22
The church in Rome already existed.
Paul didn’t start it. He didn’t build it.
By his own words — he tried to avoid it.
So why write to them?
That’s the question they don’t want you to ask.
________________________________________
Conclusion (strong, call-to-action):
But in these last days — we must ask it.
Because your answer will shape your walk, your worship, and your witness:
Do you follow the Redeemer God sent?
Or the religion man invented?



But Paul didn’t walk alone.
He had allies — men who helped spread and protect his message.
One of them was Luke.
Luke wasn’t one of the Twelve.
He never walked with Yeshua.
He never heard the Sermon on the Mount or saw the crucifixion.
He joined Paul later — and wrote two massive works: Luke and Acts.
But what did he really write?
A version of the story that centers Paul.
A gospel with no emphasis on Torah.
A record of the early church that sidelines the original disciples — and elevates Paul as the hero.
Luke was Paul’s biographer, not the Messiah’s.
His loyalty was clear.
________________________________________
But Paul?
• Preached a message the original disciples never taught
• Built a doctrine the Redeemer never preached
• Opened the door to lawlessness — and called it freedom
• Surrounded himself with men like Luke, who rewrote the story to fit his gospel

________________________________________
🔹 Acts Minimizes the Jerusalem Leadership
The book of Acts — written by Luke — is supposed to be the record of the early church. But look closely, and you’ll see something strange:
The actual apostles — the ones who walked with Yeshua — get pushed to the background.
Peter makes a few appearances early on.
James (Yeshua’s brother) speaks briefly at the Jerusalem Council.
But by chapter 13, the spotlight shifts entirely… to Paul.
From there on, Acts becomes a travel journal of Paul’s missionary journeys.
Peter vanishes. John disappears. The original disciples are sidelined.
The Jerusalem assembly — the center of the true gospel — is reduced to a minor footnote.
Why?
Because Acts wasn’t written to honor their authority.
It was written to replace it — to present Paul’s gospel as the new direction of the “church.”
________________________________________
🔹 Luke’s Gospel vs. Matthew’s: A Quiet Rewrite
Now compare Luke’s Gospel with Matthew’s — and the differences aren’t just stylistic. They’re theological.
1. Matthew is Torah-centric. Luke is not.
• Matthew opens by grounding Yeshua in Jewish lineage — “son of David, son of Abraham.”
• Yeshua says clearly: “Do not think I came to abolish the Law... until heaven and earth pass away, not the smallest letter will disappear from the Law.” (Matt 5:17–18)
But Luke waters this down.
His version of Yeshua is more vague, more “universal,” less rooted in covenant law.
2. Matthew calls for obedience. Luke softens it.
• In Matthew, Yeshua constantly calls people to repentance, righteousness, and keeping God’s commandments.
• Luke emphasizes forgiveness and inclusion — but drops the weight of obedience to Torah.
3. Matthew condemns lawlessness. Luke stays quiet.
• Matthew 7:23 — Yeshua warns that many will claim to follow Him, but He’ll say:
“Depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.”
That warning is missing from Luke.
4. Matthew focuses on the Jewish Messiah. Luke universalizes Him.
• Matthew’s Gospel speaks to Israel — and calls them back to covenant.
• Luke speaks to Gentiles — and begins the shift toward a religion no longer grounded in YHWH’s commands.
________________________________________
So when you look at Luke and Acts together — it’s not just storytelling.
It’s a redirection.
From Jerusalem to Antioch.
From Torah to “grace.”
From the disciples of Yeshua… to a man who never knew Him.

So let’s be clear:
Luke didn’t just record what happened.
He reshaped what happened.
He minimized the men Yeshua personally trained.
He elevated the man they often opposed.
He took a gospel of obedience — and reframed it as a gospel of inclusion and grace, disconnected from Torah.
Luke didn’t just write history.
He helped rewrite the faith.
And today, most of the modern church follows his version — not the one Yeshua taught.
So again we ask:
Whom do you serve?
The Redeemer who walked in covenant truth?
Or the storytellers who shifted the spotlight, rewrote the mission, and built a new religion in His name?

Paul openly admits there are two gospels — one for the circumcised (Jews) and one for the uncircumcised (Gentiles). He writes:
“They saw that I had been entrusted with the gospel to the uncircumcised, just as Peter had been to the circumcised…”
— Galatians 2:7
Two gospels?
Two messages?
Two paths?
That’s not what YHWH said.
From the beginning, YHWH made it clear: there is only one way — one law, one standard, one covenant for all.
“There shall be one law for the native and for the stranger who sojourns among you.”
— Exodus 12:49
Yeshua confirmed this — He didn’t come to create two systems. He said:
“I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through Me.”
— John 14:6
Not one way for Jews and another for Gentiles.
Not one gospel of obedience, and another of grace-without-law.
That’s not unity. That’s division.
That’s not truth. That’s confusion.
So if Paul admits he preached a different gospel…
And if God says there’s only one…
Then you have to choose:
Do you follow the gospel Yeshua taught — for all people, one standard, one path?
Or the gospel Paul created — split in two, divided by race, and detached from God’s commandments?
"For me and my family, God gives us the strength to obey His law. It’s not a burden to us—His Holy Spirit lives within us. Jesus made a way for us to repent when we fall short. The New Covenant, first spoken of in Jeremiah 31:31–34 and fulfilled by Jesus, is a promise from God that He would write His law on our hearts and remember our sins no more."